End to Population Growth:
The Protocols of Joly Anyone who starts looking into the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion will frequently encounter the old chestnut about a "hoax" or a "forgery".
When Philip Graves made the allegation inlong before the days of the internet and all the pages detailing the various logical fallacies, his target audience had never heard of a circular argument or a non sequitur. Debunking Graves is as easy as falling off a log.
Proponents of the "forgery" theory have an argument that runs like this: The forgery theorists will frequently not even bother to include part 2.
By going from their premise 1 directly to their conclusion 3their argument becomes a non sequitur. The conclusion does not follow from the premise. In order to get from 1 to 3they must include other postulates such as 2. Although premise 1 is truepremise 2 and conclusion 3 are both false.
Jewish supremacists who were plotting world conquest had more motives for plagiarism than the alleged "anti-Semites". Both would have saved time and effort. Ultimately, as we shall see, the decision to have the Protocols writers deliberately copy previous works in such a way that a number of parallel passages were strikingly obvious was taken by Alphonse de Rothschild.
His inspiration for this contingency plan, of crying "forgery" in the event of discovery, can be traced to the fact that aroundat the time of his Protocols project, he discovered that merchants from countries such as Russia were bottling cheap wine and selling it with "Lafite Rothschild" labels on the bottles.
And whatever his views were on Russians, the experience would hardly have changed them for the better! Alternatively, if they do include 2they have inserted a false postulate, and thus their argument is circular. They have started out with their desired conclusion, and have set up a false proposition in order to obtain their conclusion.
As shown above, that is not evidence of forgery. Moreover, Graves is forced to concede that "there is no evidence as to how the Geneva Dialogues reached Russia", which is consistent with the Protocols originating somewhere other than Russia.
The Protocols "served as a weapon against the Russian Liberals". Again, this is not evidence of forgery, since the Protocols would have served as a political "weapon" irrespective of who authored them.
However, Jewish supremacists would be aware that the work might be discovered, and would plan accordingly. They would have a powerful motive to do a hasty job of paraphrasing, so that the plagiarism would detected within two or three decades, would be more evident upon discovery, and "anti-Semites" could be blamed for the "forgery".
Any hypothetical "anti-Semites" would have more motive to do a good job, so that their "fraud" might remain undetected and the Protocols would continue to serve a political purpose. Where the Protocols are not derived from the Geneva Dialogues, they "were probably supplied by the Okhrana" the Russian secret police.
This is simply wishful thinking and baseless speculation on the part of Graves. Moreover, there is ample evidence that the Okhrana did not create the Protocols.
Amusingly, the former French Chief Rabbi Gilles Bernheim, an Ashkenazi Jew, was recently exposed as a plagiarist who lied about his credentials.
This claim soon fell apart, and then Bernheim tried to blame a research assistant.
But it gets even better - Bernheim was found to have plagiarised several other people, including Elie Wiesel! And then it turned out that Bernheim was not the intellectual that he purported to be; he claimed to have a doctorate in philosophy, but had never finished his degree.
They were seen off by the guy and six of his friends. Labeouf got into a fight and threatened to pull a knife in Vancouver inand in head-butted a man after an argument in a London pub.
But it gets better. LaBeouf proved to be quite a plagiarist. His short film HowardCantour. When LaBeouf apologized to Clowes, it was noted that the apology itself was lifted from a post on Yahoo!
He also apologised for having plagiarised other online sources for another unpublished book, and said, "after a gap of maybe weeks or sometimes months, I simply did not recall that I had not written these passages myself ".
In short, anyone who continues to claim the Protocols is a "forgery" because parts of it were plagiarised might as well have a tattoo branded on their forehead.
There are two choices: There is no denying that parts of the Protocols were plagiarised, and the plagiarism is strikingly obvious - exactly as if the writer had intended it to be found.
Man has more enthusiasm for evil than for good; fear and force have more control over him than reason.17 Sep , pm Comment: Britain and the US are the dynamic duo of the world. We must resist the likes of Corbyn to keep it that way.
1. Foreword by David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Corruption is the cancer at the heart of so many of our problems in the world today.
The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has a rich history of intervention over many decades in Guatemala, a country in Central America that the US government has generally viewed as "its backyard." Guatemala is bordered by the North Pacific Ocean and the Gulf of Honduras (also known as the Caribbean Sea).The four bordering countries are Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras and Belize.
THE POISONED NEEDLE Suppressed Facts About Vaccination By Eleanor McBean [Whale, June ] To read only the polio sections see Hidden Dangers in Polio Vaccine by Eleanor McBean. PREFACE. CHAPTER I THE POISONED NEEDLE. A US Military Intelligence report known as the Red House Report (EW-Pa ), is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge .
by Robert Engelman We are far from a world in which all births result from intended pregnancies. Surveys show that approximately 40% of pregnancies are unintended in developing countries, and 47% in developed ones.