She is concerned with the use of knowledge for good or evil purposes, the invasion of technology into modern life, the treatment of the poor or uneducated, and the restorative powers of nature in the face of unnatural events. She addresses each concern in the novel, but some concerns are not fully addressed or answered.
How to Write a Summary of an Article? Frankenstein and the Human Mind The human mind is something scientists have been trying to comprehend forever.
Frankenstein thought he would be able to create and control the mind of a creature. He had tried many times, but to no avail. After talking with a professor, he finally figured out a way that he would be able to complete what he had been trying to for years.
But does Frankenstein pass that natural boundary placed before us by our peers? To create life, a being with its own mind, had never been done before.
What are the consequences of his actions and was it truly worth it to go beyond those limits? Mary Shelley says no, it was not worth it. Frankenstein thought he would be able to control this creature, control his emotions and how he would act on them.
He would quickly find out that that was not the case. There was nothing he could say or do, and certainly nothing science could do, to change the thinking of the creature.
He, by creating life, had attached himself to this being from the very beginning. When the creature is out in the streets for the first time, the whole town is completely against him, trying to bring him down, throwing stuff at him, etc. There is nothing science can do to take the anger and sadness out from the creature.
It is only natural to the mind that you will feel such emotions if a whole town is against you. That is just how the mind works. It reacts to certain situations in a certain way, beyond sciences control.
Frankenstein tried to forget about the creature, but it crept right back up into his life with the murder of his little brother, William. The creature is angry with Frankenstein, angry for what he had done to him.
He demands a female partner, which brings us to another argument brought forward by Shelley. When you venture into the unknown by creating life, by creating unnatural beings, you risk the threat of more than one being created. When you pass that boundary by scientifically experimenting with the human mind and life, only bad things can come from it.
In the film, Frankenstein is put forth with a very dangerous task. Mary Shelley stresses that both of these outcomes are bad, and that it is impossible to avoid both circumstances.
This is incredibly dangerous, as you cannot control it after this point. If the being you gave life to is bigger or stronger than you, you are at the will of it to do what it asks. Frankenstein then proceeds to pass that boundary even further, by replicating the mind of his wife in the same manner in which he created the creature.
The creature tries to bring her to his side, finally getting what he wanted, a partner. But, in a struggle over the possession of Elizabeth, she screams and commits suicide, hurting Frankenstein even more.
What he thought would enhance science and bring innovation would ultimately be his downfall. And that is because he ventured past that boundary by trying to create or replicate the human mind, something in which science has no control over.
The human mind cannot be altered or replicated successfully in any way, and any attempts to do so will end in a disastrous manner. I agree with Shelley in this regard, as she proved in her film. The human mind is something so complex that scientists are still trying to figure it out entirely, let alone duplicate it, or create it from scratch.
Frankenstein was attempting to use some brains from dead people in his attempts at creating life, but it is still all wrong just the same. It is immoral and without a doubt beyond that limit that should not be passed. We saw a very clear example of what Shelley thinks would happen, and I think it is safe to say it is fairly accurate.
You could theoretically try to pull something off like Frankenstein did, and you may even be able to control that being, but would it be worth it?
Shelley says no, and I agree with her.Through various realistic fictional stories such as Frankenstein and Rise of the Planet of Apes, people are able to get a clear picture as to how far the human mind can go.
After reading and watching ‘Frankenstein’ and the ‘The Rise of the Planet of Apes’, it is evident that both tales share common themes of science and ambition.
Though not as spectacular as one would expect of such a classic, this loose interpretation of Mary Shelley's oft-told tale delivers. The familiar story focuses on Dr.
Victor Frankenstein, the reclusive, stereotypical mad scientist obsessed with creating new life from stitched-together corpses. As a response to your final question, I believe that Frankenstein’s creature truly was just as human as any other. His behavior and reactions, though eventually violent and accentuated by his increased strength and speed, were nothing short of human throughout the entire novel.
The human mind is something scientists have been trying to comprehend forever. Science can not alter how the mind communicates with one’s body, or even how it works. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein uses the creation of a fake being to emphasize the fact that the human mind cannot be altered or .
Below you will find five outstanding thesis statements / paper topics for “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley that can be used as essay starters. Thus, while Shelley does not mention government in any way, her thoughts on human nature seem to argue for a more democratic society in which all humans, and even Dr.
Frankenstein’s creation have basic rights and are treated equally.