Freedom from Hunger and Thirst - by ready access to fresh water and a diet to maintain full health and vigour.
Yet despite the crucial part that animals play in scientific progress, public Animal research and its importance essay for animal research is fragile. That is due in part to misleading and negative public campaigns by animal-rights extremists. The aggressive tactics directed at Christine Lattin, a postdoctoral researcher in biology at Yale University, and her research is a recent example of the personal risk that animal researchers often encounter.
Lattin, a self-proclaimed bird lover, began her research on birds to better understand the variation in stress response by species. She hopes her passion-driven research will assist in conservation efforts in the face of persistent habitat threats, from oil spills to climate change.
In the interest of full transparency, Lattin posted her studies on her websiteat which point she became a target of animal-rights extremists who have mischaracterized her work in a public campaign.
Few research institutions, for instance, publicly discuss the use and oversight of animals in laboratories. The ethical use of animals in research is in fact guided by the mandatory three Rs: Federal law requires institutions to review, approve and monitor each animal study to comply with regulations and ensure that all personnel working with research animals are appropriately trained.
Scientists are also personally committed to the responsible and humane treatment of animals, both because of our ethical responsibilities to the animals and for generating the best-quality research results.
A proactive approach that research institutions can take to support animal researchers is to develop plans and partner with scientists who, like Lattin, are willing to enter the public sphere to talk about these issues.
Institutions have an important role to play in providing support and resources in this public conversation. In addition, institutions need strategic plans for supporting researchers who come under attack and for publicly responding to incidents.
Failure to take these proactive measures puts the institution and its researchers at risk of becoming targets of extremists. The scientific community knows firsthand what can happen when institutions are not adequately prepared -- or when they mistakenly believe they are ready to defend research and scientists.
After an animal-rights activist infiltrated its Institute for Biological Cybernetics and released a misleading, heavily edited video of primates used in neuroscience research, Max Planck was catapulted into the center of a high-profile public investigation and negative campaign by animal-rights extremists.
The institution also recently produced a thought-leading white paper on animal research, including a series of principles, recommendations and measures designed to balance the need for animal research with the obligation to conduct that research ethically and responsibly.
That included introducing a novel fourth R principle for responsibilityrepresenting the commitment of researchers to use knowledge in life sciences and humanities to promote animal welfare in their institutes, as well as developing a mandatory ethics curriculum for staff members.
Institutions can take many lessons from the Max Planck example. When attacks on animal research arise, institutions must deliver a swift and forceful public response, not remain silent. Institutions should be equipped, first and foremost, to protect their researchers and their work.
This includes being prepared to take legal measures, issuing public statements of support using accurate information, and providing moral, psychological and, if warranted, physical support to researchers and staff.
Advanced preparation and swift, accurate responses are essential. But the best way to prevent these attacks is through proactive public campaigns that illustrate the value of the research the institution conducts.
The University of Wisconsin Madison is a leading example of institutional openness on animal research and preparedness to respond to animal-rights extremists.
Eric Sandgren, former director of its Research Animals Resources Centerhas established the Common Ground on Animal Research Initiative within the university and the surrounding community.Americans for Medical Progress endorses the “3Rs”: refinement of tests so animal distress or pain is minimal, reduction of the number of animals used in a study, and the replacement, whenever possible, of animal experiments with non-animal ashio-midori.com actively champion the development, validation, use and regulatory acceptance of alternatives to animal research.
Many animal welfare proponents call themselves animal rights advocates because that term seems to represent what they believe, but animal welfare and animal rights are based in entirely different beliefs and use different tactics to achieve their goals.
The Controversy Over Animal Research Composition: CM Argumentative Essay Globe University- Madison East Katelyn Shere Animal research will always be a very controversial subject in the veterinary field and also in the general public.
Animal Farm and the Importance of Education Essay Sample.
Animal Farm is educational in many ways. It teaches that it is easy to be influenced if individuals do not take a stand for what they believe in. Essay on Animal Testing: "pro" arguments. 09 August malaria and tuberculosis. Especially, doctors highlight the importance of using chimps for testing as they are helpful in finding treatment for Hepatitis B and C.
In your animal testing essay it is worth mentioning that, although some of its practices are now necessary and have. The importance of animal research to those suffering from heart and circulatory diseases cannot be overlooked.
According to recent estimates, one in four U.S. adults has high blood pressure, which can cause strokes, heart attacks, and heart disease, and nearly one-third of them don’t know it (American Heart Association).